TY - JOUR
T1 - Group dynamic assessment vs. computerized dynamic assessment
T2 - impacts on L2 listening development, L2 students’ perfectionism, foreign language anxiety, and intrinsic motivation
AU - Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, Khaled
AU - Karimi, Ali Reza
AU - Abdelrasheed, Nasser Said Gomaa
AU - Shatalebi, Vida
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Dynamic assessment is heavily based on Vygotskian socio-cultural theory and in recent years researchers have shown interest in the theory as a way to facilitate learning. This study attempted to examine the comparative effect of group dynamic assessment (GDA) and computerized dynamic assessment (CDA) on listening development, L2 learners’ perfectionism, anxiety, and intrinsic motivation. To this end, 91 intermediate learners of English were selected based on convenience sampling and were divided into 3 groups: a GDA, a CDA, and a control group (CG). After implementing the treatment, the tests conducted and the data gathered. The results of one-way ANOVA showed that both GDA and CDA were facilitative of listening development with a large effect size (effect size =.516), and the difference between them was nonsignificant (p > 0.05). The results further showed that both GDA and CDA could ameliorate perfectionism with a moderate effect size (effect size =.332), decrease anxiety with a small effect size (.218), and increase intrinsic motivation among L2 learners with a small effect size (effect size =.228). The findings can have implications for language practitioners, and materials developers. The implications of the study are discussed.
AB - Dynamic assessment is heavily based on Vygotskian socio-cultural theory and in recent years researchers have shown interest in the theory as a way to facilitate learning. This study attempted to examine the comparative effect of group dynamic assessment (GDA) and computerized dynamic assessment (CDA) on listening development, L2 learners’ perfectionism, anxiety, and intrinsic motivation. To this end, 91 intermediate learners of English were selected based on convenience sampling and were divided into 3 groups: a GDA, a CDA, and a control group (CG). After implementing the treatment, the tests conducted and the data gathered. The results of one-way ANOVA showed that both GDA and CDA were facilitative of listening development with a large effect size (effect size =.516), and the difference between them was nonsignificant (p > 0.05). The results further showed that both GDA and CDA could ameliorate perfectionism with a moderate effect size (effect size =.332), decrease anxiety with a small effect size (.218), and increase intrinsic motivation among L2 learners with a small effect size (effect size =.228). The findings can have implications for language practitioners, and materials developers. The implications of the study are discussed.
KW - Anxiety
KW - CDA
KW - GDA
KW - Intrinsic Motivation
KW - Listening development
KW - Perfectionism
KW - Sociocultural theory
KW - ZPD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163753889&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40468-023-00245-1
DO - 10.1186/s40468-023-00245-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163753889
SN - 2229-0443
VL - 13
JO - Language Testing in Asia
JF - Language Testing in Asia
IS - 1
M1 - 32
ER -