TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of promoters on NiO catalysts for methane decomposition and hydrogen production
AU - Alharthi, Abdulrahman I.
AU - Ayad Alosaimi Alotaibi, Mshari
AU - Abdel‑Fattah, Essam M.
AU - Qahtan, Talal F.
AU - Alshreef, Osama A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - In this study, the impact of Al, Co, and Cu as promoters for NiO to enhance its catalytic performance in methane decomposition has been investigated. The catalysts were synthesized via a co-precipitation route and comprehensively characterized using SEM, BET, XRD, XPS, Raman, TPR, and TGA techniques. Catalytic performance was evaluated in a fixed-bed reactor operated at 800 °C with a feed gas flow rate of 20 mL/min. Al³⁺ and Cu²⁺ incorporation into NiO reduced crystallite size and increased surface area, while Co2+ had the opposite effect, indicating a distinct structural impact. Additionally, Al³⁺ doping induced a charge imbalance in NiO, leading to an increase in Ni2⁺ content and oxygen vacancies, as confirmed by XPS analysis. Catalytic activity tests revealed that Al³⁺ was the most effective promoter for NiO, followed by Co²⁺ and Cu²⁺, respectively. The highest CH₄ conversion rate and H₂ production rate, achieved with 10% Al-NiO at a time-on-stream (TOS) of 25 min, were 71% and 216.2 × 10⁻⁵ mol H₂ g⁻¹ min− 1, respectively. The methane decomposition process exhibited stable operation with minimal CO and CO₂ emissions. The catalytic performance was correlated with the detailed physicochemical properties of both fresh and spent catalysts.
AB - In this study, the impact of Al, Co, and Cu as promoters for NiO to enhance its catalytic performance in methane decomposition has been investigated. The catalysts were synthesized via a co-precipitation route and comprehensively characterized using SEM, BET, XRD, XPS, Raman, TPR, and TGA techniques. Catalytic performance was evaluated in a fixed-bed reactor operated at 800 °C with a feed gas flow rate of 20 mL/min. Al³⁺ and Cu²⁺ incorporation into NiO reduced crystallite size and increased surface area, while Co2+ had the opposite effect, indicating a distinct structural impact. Additionally, Al³⁺ doping induced a charge imbalance in NiO, leading to an increase in Ni2⁺ content and oxygen vacancies, as confirmed by XPS analysis. Catalytic activity tests revealed that Al³⁺ was the most effective promoter for NiO, followed by Co²⁺ and Cu²⁺, respectively. The highest CH₄ conversion rate and H₂ production rate, achieved with 10% Al-NiO at a time-on-stream (TOS) of 25 min, were 71% and 216.2 × 10⁻⁵ mol H₂ g⁻¹ min− 1, respectively. The methane decomposition process exhibited stable operation with minimal CO and CO₂ emissions. The catalytic performance was correlated with the detailed physicochemical properties of both fresh and spent catalysts.
KW - Al-NiO
KW - Carbon nanostructures
KW - Co-NiO
KW - Cu-NiO
KW - Hydrogen production
KW - Methane decomposition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105009543333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-025-05727-1
DO - 10.1038/s41598-025-05727-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 40594156
AN - SCOPUS:105009543333
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 15
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 21448
ER -