Abstract
This paper examines the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) and its impact on enhancing safety standards for pesticides used on food in the United States. Initially, the study explores the Delaney Clause—a strict standard prohibiting carcinogenic food additives— which FQPA replaced with a more flexible "reasonable certainty of no harm" criterion. This shift allows the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to assess pesticide risk with consideration of potential benefits, even if a substance is carcinogenic at high doses. The paper also critiques the EPA's implementation challenges, including reliance on quantitative risk assessment (QRA) and cumulati ve risk assessment, which quantify risks of multiple chemical exposures but face informational and regulatory limitations. Recommendations focus on refining judicial review and integrating cumulative risk assessment to strengthen the FQPA’s capacity to safeguard public health, especially for vulnerable populations such as children. This study underscores the importance of regulatory clarity and rigorous assessment methods in pesticide management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1044-1054 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Ecohumanism |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 10 Nov 2024 |
Keywords
- Carcinogenic Additives
- Certainty of No Harm
- Cumulative Risk Assessment
- Delaney Clause
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
- Pesticide Regulation
- Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA)
- Reasonable