The Impact of Automatic Exposure Control Technology on the In Vivo Radiation Dose in Digital Mammography: A Comparison Between Different Systems and Target/Filter Combinations

Ahmad A. Alhulail, Salman M. Albeshan, Mohammed S. Alshuhri, Essam M. Alkhybari, Mansour A. Almanaa, Haitham Alahmad, Khaled Alenazi, Abdulaziz S. Alshabibi, Mohammed Alsufayan, Saleh A. Alsulaiman, Maha M. Almuqbil, Mahmoud M. Elsharkawi, Sultan Alghamdi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Digital mammography is widely used for breast cancer screening; however, variations in system design and automatic exposure control (AEC) strategies can lead to significant differences in radiation dose, potentially affecting the diagnostic quality and patient safety. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of various mammographic technologies on the in vivo mean glandular doses (MGDs) that are received in clinical settings. Methods: The MGDs and applied acquisition parameters from 194,608 mammograms, acquired employing AEC using different digital mammography systems (GE, Siemens, and two different models of Hologic), were retrospectively collected. The potential variation in MGD resulting from different technologies (system and target/filter combination) was assessed employing the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s post hoc. The AEC optimization of acquisition parameters (kVp, mAs) within each system was investigated through a multi-regression analysis as a function of the compressed breast thickness (CBT). The trend line of these parameters in addition to the MGD and source-to-breast distance were also plotted and compared. Results: There were significant variations in delivered doses per CBT based on which technology was used (p < 0.001). The regression analyses revealed system-specific differences in AEC adjustments of mAs and kVp in response to CBT changes. As the CBT increases, the MGD increases with different degrees, rates, and patterns across systems due to differences in AEC strategies. Conclusions: The MGD is affected by the applied technology, which is different between systems. Clinicians need to be aware of these variations and how they affect the MGD. Additionally, manufacturers may need to consider standardizing the implemented technology effects on the MGDs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1185
JournalDiagnostics
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Keywords

  • AEC optimization
  • compressed breast thickness
  • digital mammography
  • mammography technology
  • mean glandular dose
  • target/filter combination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of Automatic Exposure Control Technology on the In Vivo Radiation Dose in Digital Mammography: A Comparison Between Different Systems and Target/Filter Combinations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this