Abstract
Objectives: This paper compares the perspectives of sixteen Quranic exegetes with those of Islamic polemicists specialised in Christian studies, particularly in their treatment of the Christian concept of the Trinity. Methodology: The paper employs an inductive approach to uncover the views of various Quranic interpreters and Islamic polemicists regarding the Trinity. Besides, it utilises a comparative meth-od to discuss and contrast their opinions on the subject matter. Findings: Comparing the polemicists’ views with those of the exegetes reveals the precision and consistency of the former in conveying the Christian understanding of the Trinity. In contrast, the exegetes' interpretations vary, with some describing it as three hypostases, others as three gods, and occasionally an exegete may mention both interpretations. There is also a distinction in ad-dressing the third entity of the Trinity. While the polemicists identify it as the Holy Spirit, some exegetes alternatively mention Mary, and others refer to both views. Originality: The paper underscores the importance of cautiously conveying Christian beliefs about the Trinity based on certain exegetes, highlighting the specialisation of polemicists in religious studies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 17-51 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | Journal of College of Sharia and Islamic Studies |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2024 |
Keywords
- Christian Doctrines
- Christian Trinity
- Islam-ic-Christian Dialogue
- Quranic Exegesis
- Trinitarianism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Christian Trinity in the Writings of Quranic Exegetes: A Comparison with Islamic Polemicists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver