TY - JOUR
T1 - Status of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in species of wild birds
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Wada, Yusuf
AU - Ibrahim, Abdulhamid Bruor
AU - Umar, Yahaya Abdullahi
AU - Afolabi, Hafeez A.
AU - Wada, Mustapha
AU - Alissa, Mohammed
AU - Al Amri, Kawthar Amur Salim
AU - AL Ibrahim, Amani Ahmed
AU - Al Fares, Mona A.
AU - Albayat, Hawra
AU - AlKhathlan, Mohammed Kamal
AU - Al Kaabi, Nawal A.
AU - Al-Subaie, Maha F.
AU - Alfaresi, Mubarak
AU - Alrasheed, Hayam A.
AU - Rabaan, Ali A.
AU - Yean, Chan Yean
AU - Zaidah, Abdul Rahman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Wild birds could be a reservoir of medically relevant microorganisms, particularly multidrug-resistant Enterococcus spp. Resistant bacteria's epidemiology and transmission between animals and humans has grown, and their zoonotic potential cannot be ignored. This is the first study to evaluate the status of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) in various wild bird species using meta-analysis and a systematic review. In this study, the pooled prevalence was obtained by analyzing data from published articles on the occurrence of VRE in wild bird species. It's unclear how the antibiotic resistance gene transfer cycle affects wild birds. Google Scholar and PubMed were used to conduct the research. The data and study methodology was assessed and extracted by two reviewers independently, with a third reviewing the results. Heterogeneity between study and publication bias were analyzed using the random effect model. Thirty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. 382 out of the 4144 isolates tested, were VRE. The pooled prevalence of VRE among wild birds was estimated at 11.0% (95% CI; 6.9 –17.2%; I2 = 93.204%; P < 0.001). There was high variability between study (t2 = 2.156; heterogeneity I2 = 93.204% with chi-square (Q) = 544.413, degrees of freedom (df) = 37, and P < 0.001). Egger's test verified the funnel plot's bias, while result from the leave-one-out forest plot had no effect on the pooled prevalence.
AB - Wild birds could be a reservoir of medically relevant microorganisms, particularly multidrug-resistant Enterococcus spp. Resistant bacteria's epidemiology and transmission between animals and humans has grown, and their zoonotic potential cannot be ignored. This is the first study to evaluate the status of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) in various wild bird species using meta-analysis and a systematic review. In this study, the pooled prevalence was obtained by analyzing data from published articles on the occurrence of VRE in wild bird species. It's unclear how the antibiotic resistance gene transfer cycle affects wild birds. Google Scholar and PubMed were used to conduct the research. The data and study methodology was assessed and extracted by two reviewers independently, with a third reviewing the results. Heterogeneity between study and publication bias were analyzed using the random effect model. Thirty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. 382 out of the 4144 isolates tested, were VRE. The pooled prevalence of VRE among wild birds was estimated at 11.0% (95% CI; 6.9 –17.2%; I2 = 93.204%; P < 0.001). There was high variability between study (t2 = 2.156; heterogeneity I2 = 93.204% with chi-square (Q) = 544.413, degrees of freedom (df) = 37, and P < 0.001). Egger's test verified the funnel plot's bias, while result from the leave-one-out forest plot had no effect on the pooled prevalence.
KW - Crows
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Rooks
KW - Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
KW - Wild birds
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190888808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.04.004
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38657438
AN - SCOPUS:85190888808
SN - 1876-0341
VL - 17
SP - 1023
EP - 1036
JO - Journal of Infection and Public Health
JF - Journal of Infection and Public Health
IS - 6
ER -