One Word and Multiple Senses: John Locke’s Philosophy of Abuse of Language

Shaista Zeb, Muhammad Ajmal, Martina Pavlikova, Sohaib Alam, Farhan Ahmad, Sameena Banu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper aims at examining the impotence of language or what is famously referred to as the phenomenon of inconsistency of language through the philosophy of John Locke on the abuse of language and with specific reference to the Eighth Edition of the Oxford Advanced Learner‟s Dictionary authored by Hornby (2010). Locke as well stated that adequate signs which he also referred to as words are lost or corrupted especially when a word is given many meanings. By discussing selected entries of the dictionary, the present research intends to demonstrate how polysemanticity and the use or a word in different contexts can cause what Locke called language misuse. Illustrating in the case of particular examples, the study shows the potential consequence of this process for the language learners and users, stressing on the necessity to enhance the meticulousness of the language one will opt to use. The research concludes that there is need to resolve discrepancies that grow from these ambiguities for language teachers and lexicographers to improve meaning and communication, an idea supported by Locke‟s goal of enforcing the correct usage of language among English speakers. Results imply that teachers should draw students‟ attention to the fact that words‟ meanings cannot be understood separately from their contexts. Language educators are advised to introduce the students to the different meanings of words and contexts of their use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-425
Number of pages9
JournalWorld Journal of English Language
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Abuse of Language
  • Inconstancy of words
  • John Locke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One Word and Multiple Senses: John Locke’s Philosophy of Abuse of Language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this