TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine learning models for predicting the compressive strength of cement-based mortar materials
T2 - Hyper tuning and optimization
AU - Alyami, Mana
AU - Ullah, Irfan
AU - AlAteah, Ali H.
AU - Alsubeai, Ali
AU - Alahmari, Turki S.
AU - Farooq, Furqan
AU - Alabduljabbar, Hisham
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Institution of Structural Engineers
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - This study utilized machine learning approaches, encompassing gradient boosting (GB), gene expression programming (GEP), decision trees (DT), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), SVR with Bagging (SVR-Bagging), and SVR with Boosting (SVR-Boosting), to develop a robust model for estimating the compressive strength (CS) of mortar with or without metakaolin. GB algorithm emerged as the optimal choice. Notably, GB achieved the greatest coefficient of determination value (0.99), signifying its superior predicting power compared to SVR-Boosting (0.94), DT (0.92), GEP (0.91), RF (0.90), SVR-Bagging (0.87), SVR (0.79). Additionally, GB exhibited the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) score (2.07), indicating its accuracy in estimating the CS of metakaolin mortar with minimal deviation from the experimental values. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), individual conditional expectation plots, and partial dependence plots were utilized to provide a deeper interpretation of the model results. Age of mortar demonstrated a strong positive correlation with CS, while water-to-binder ratio and binder-to-sand ratio exhibited negative associations. Additionally, maximum diameter of aggregate influenced CS negatively, whereas metakaolin-to-binder ratio and superplasticizer content showed positive correlations. A user-friendly graphical interface was developed to predict the CS of the mortar, providing immediate results without the need for traditional, time-consuming experimental procedures.
AB - This study utilized machine learning approaches, encompassing gradient boosting (GB), gene expression programming (GEP), decision trees (DT), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), SVR with Bagging (SVR-Bagging), and SVR with Boosting (SVR-Boosting), to develop a robust model for estimating the compressive strength (CS) of mortar with or without metakaolin. GB algorithm emerged as the optimal choice. Notably, GB achieved the greatest coefficient of determination value (0.99), signifying its superior predicting power compared to SVR-Boosting (0.94), DT (0.92), GEP (0.91), RF (0.90), SVR-Bagging (0.87), SVR (0.79). Additionally, GB exhibited the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) score (2.07), indicating its accuracy in estimating the CS of metakaolin mortar with minimal deviation from the experimental values. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), individual conditional expectation plots, and partial dependence plots were utilized to provide a deeper interpretation of the model results. Age of mortar demonstrated a strong positive correlation with CS, while water-to-binder ratio and binder-to-sand ratio exhibited negative associations. Additionally, maximum diameter of aggregate influenced CS negatively, whereas metakaolin-to-binder ratio and superplasticizer content showed positive correlations. A user-friendly graphical interface was developed to predict the CS of the mortar, providing immediate results without the need for traditional, time-consuming experimental procedures.
KW - Bagging
KW - Boosting
KW - Compressive strength
KW - Machine learning
KW - Metakaolin
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85211341886
U2 - 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107931
DO - 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107931
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85211341886
SN - 2352-0124
VL - 71
JO - Structures
JF - Structures
M1 - 107931
ER -