TY - JOUR
T1 - Laser photobiomodulation is more effective than ultrasound therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain
T2 - a comparative study
AU - Tantawy, Sayed A.
AU - Kamal Abdelbasset, Walid
AU - Kamel, Dalia M.
AU - Alrawaili, Saud M.
AU - Alsubaie, Saud F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of laser photobiomodulation therapy (lPBMt) and ultrasound therapy (UST) in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). Forty-five patients with CNLBP aged 30–40 years were divided randomly into three groups of 15 subjects each. The lPBMt group received 8 weeks of lPBMt with an exercise program, while the UST group received 8 weeks of UST with the same exercise program; the control group received only the exercise program for 8 weeks. Pain, disability, functional performance, and lumbar range of motion were assessed at the beginning of the study and after 8 weeks. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics among the three groups at baseline (p > 0.05). At the end of the study, there were significant improvements in pain, disability, and functional performance in the two experimental groups (p < 0.05), but changes in the control group were non-significant. However, lumbar range of motion was significantly improved only in the lPBMt group (p < 0.05). When the three groups were compared in terms of a change in clinical variables, there was a significant difference among the three groups in all measures in favor of lPBMt group. Based on our results, both lPBMt or UST combined with an 8-week exercise program seemed to be effective methods for decreasing pain, reducing disability, and increasing functional performance in patients with CNLBP, although lPBMt is more effective than UST.
AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of laser photobiomodulation therapy (lPBMt) and ultrasound therapy (UST) in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). Forty-five patients with CNLBP aged 30–40 years were divided randomly into three groups of 15 subjects each. The lPBMt group received 8 weeks of lPBMt with an exercise program, while the UST group received 8 weeks of UST with the same exercise program; the control group received only the exercise program for 8 weeks. Pain, disability, functional performance, and lumbar range of motion were assessed at the beginning of the study and after 8 weeks. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics among the three groups at baseline (p > 0.05). At the end of the study, there were significant improvements in pain, disability, and functional performance in the two experimental groups (p < 0.05), but changes in the control group were non-significant. However, lumbar range of motion was significantly improved only in the lPBMt group (p < 0.05). When the three groups were compared in terms of a change in clinical variables, there was a significant difference among the three groups in all measures in favor of lPBMt group. Based on our results, both lPBMt or UST combined with an 8-week exercise program seemed to be effective methods for decreasing pain, reducing disability, and increasing functional performance in patients with CNLBP, although lPBMt is more effective than UST.
KW - Disability
KW - Laser photobiomodulation therapy
KW - Low back pain
KW - Ultrasound therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055486636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10103-018-2665-8
DO - 10.1007/s10103-018-2665-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 30334124
AN - SCOPUS:85055486636
SN - 0268-8921
VL - 34
SP - 793
EP - 800
JO - Lasers in Medical Science
JF - Lasers in Medical Science
IS - 4
ER -