Instrumented trunk impairment scale (iTIS): A reliable measure of trunk impairment in the stroke population

Norah Alhwoaimel, Ruth Turk, Ann Marie Hughes, Federico Ferrari, Jane Burridge, Seng Kwee Wee, Geert Verheyden, Martin Warner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) is recommended for use in clinical research to assess trunk impairment post-stroke. However, it is observer dependent and does not consider the quality of trunk movement. To address these challenges, this study proposes an instrumented TIS (iTIS). Objective: This study aims to investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the iTIS in chronic stroke patients. Method: Trunk impairment was assessed in 20 patients with stroke using the iTIS Valedo system; three sensors were fixed to the skin on the sternum, L1 and S1 levels. Interclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (between days) with 95% CI. Results: Reliability for the dynamic subscale parameters was good to excellent (intra-rater ICC = 0.60–0.95; inter-rater ICC = 0.59–0.93); however, reliability for the coordination parameters was poor to good (intra-rater ICC = 0.05–0.72) and poor to excellent (inter-rater ICC = 0.04–0.78). Conclusion: The iTIS demonstrates an acceptable level of reliability for dynamic subscale measurement in research and clinical practice. Further studies could use larger sample sizes and improve the iTIS methodology by employing additional sensors on the limbs to detect compensatory movements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)456-463
Number of pages8
JournalTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Objective assessment
  • Trunk Impairment Scale
  • inertial sensor
  • instrumented trunk impairment scale
  • stroke
  • validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Instrumented trunk impairment scale (iTIS): A reliable measure of trunk impairment in the stroke population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this