TY - JOUR
T1 - Groundwater pollution equation
T2 - Lie's symmetry analysis and numerical consideration
AU - Aljohani, A. F.
AU - Alsisi, Abdulhamed
AU - Althobaiti, Saad
AU - Nass, Aminu M.
AU - Nuruddeen, R. I.
AU - Selim, Mahmoud M.
AU - Alamri, Osama
AU - Althobaiti, Ali
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - The current study modeled groundwater pollution through the utilization of the advection–diffusion equation - a versatile differential equation that is capable of modeling a variety of real-life processes. Indeed, various methods of solutions were then proposed to examine the governing model after being transformed, starting with Lie's symmetry, semi-analytical, and numerical methods, including the explicit and implicit finite difference method and the finite element method. Further, the proposed methods were demonstrated on some test models; featuring forced and unforced scenarios of the forcing function. Analytically, Lie's symmetry method failed to unswervingly reveal the required solution to the problem; however, with the imposition of certain restrictions, a generalized closed-form solution for the forced model was acquired. This fact indeed triggered the quest for the deployment of more methods. Thus, semi-analytically, the adopted decomposition method swiftly gave the resultant closed-form solutions. Numerically, the efficiency of the sought methods was assessed using the L2−norm and CPU time, upon which the implicit schemes were found to win the race. All-in-all, the beseeched semi-analytical method is highly recommended for such investigation; at the same time advocating the effectiveness of the implicit finite difference schemes on advection–diffusion-related equations.
AB - The current study modeled groundwater pollution through the utilization of the advection–diffusion equation - a versatile differential equation that is capable of modeling a variety of real-life processes. Indeed, various methods of solutions were then proposed to examine the governing model after being transformed, starting with Lie's symmetry, semi-analytical, and numerical methods, including the explicit and implicit finite difference method and the finite element method. Further, the proposed methods were demonstrated on some test models; featuring forced and unforced scenarios of the forcing function. Analytically, Lie's symmetry method failed to unswervingly reveal the required solution to the problem; however, with the imposition of certain restrictions, a generalized closed-form solution for the forced model was acquired. This fact indeed triggered the quest for the deployment of more methods. Thus, semi-analytically, the adopted decomposition method swiftly gave the resultant closed-form solutions. Numerically, the efficiency of the sought methods was assessed using the L2−norm and CPU time, upon which the implicit schemes were found to win the race. All-in-all, the beseeched semi-analytical method is highly recommended for such investigation; at the same time advocating the effectiveness of the implicit finite difference schemes on advection–diffusion-related equations.
KW - Advection–diffusion equation
KW - Decomposition methods
KW - Finite difference approaches
KW - Groundwater pollution equation
KW - Lie's symmetry method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201001074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100861
DO - 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100861
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85201001074
SN - 2666-8181
VL - 11
JO - Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics
JF - Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics
M1 - 100861
ER -