TY - JOUR
T1 - First-Line Levofloxacin-Based Triple Therapy Versus Standard Bismuth-Based Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Saudi Arabia
T2 - A Retrospective Single-Center Study
AU - Abdulqader, Abdulrhman Khaled Al
AU - Alamri, Turki Abdullah
AU - Alhamad, Mahdi Abdullah
AU - Shehab El-Deen, Somaia
AU - Essa, Abdallah
AU - Alfayez, Raed Abdullah
AU - Albaqshi, Baqer Mohammed
AU - Almajed, Adnan Salah
AU - Alhassan, Mohammed Yousef
AU - Essa, Ali
AU - Albadrani, Ahmed Abdullah
AU - Alomair, Omar
AU - Al Jalal, Bashaeer Abdullh
AU - Almulhim, Mohammed Yousef
AU - Alotaibi, Abdullah
AU - Darwish, Ehab
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Background and Aims: Antibiotic resistance in Saudi Arabia has led to decreased efficacy of conventional triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, prompting the development of alternative treatments like levofloxacin-based triple and bismuth-based quadruple therapies. However, comparative data regarding its efficacy are lacking. Therefore, this study's goal was to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy with that of standard bismuth-based quadruple therapy as first-line regimens. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 197 treatment-naïve adults with H. pylori infection who received levofloxacin-based triple (levofloxacin + amoxicillin + PPI) therapy (n = 81) or standard bismuth-based quadruple (bismuth + tetracycline + metronidazole + PPI) therapy (n = 116). H. pylori eradication was evaluated 4–8 weeks after medication administration using the 13C-urea breath test, and variables that could affect the rate of success were examined. Results: There were no differences between groups in terms of age, sex, nationality, or type of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) used. The bismuth-based quadruple therapy group exhibited a markedly superior success rate compared to the levofloxacin-based triple therapy group when the latter was administered for 7 or 10 days (81.03% vs. 6.66%, p < 0.001, and 81.03% vs. 36.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). However, when the levofloxacin-based triple therapy was extended to 14 days, its H. pylori eradication rate became comparable to that of the 10-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (81.03% vs. 80%, p = 0.898). Eradication rates for both regimens were similar for patients aged ≥ 60, non-Saudi, when using omeprazole and those treated with levofloxacin-based triple therapy for 14 days. Conclusion: Quadruple treatment based on bismuth is superior to triple therapy based on levofloxacin for eradicating H. pylori in Saudi Arabia and should be used as a first-line treatment. However, the 14-day levofloxacin-based triple treatment had an H. pylori eradication rate comparable to that of the 10-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy.
AB - Background and Aims: Antibiotic resistance in Saudi Arabia has led to decreased efficacy of conventional triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, prompting the development of alternative treatments like levofloxacin-based triple and bismuth-based quadruple therapies. However, comparative data regarding its efficacy are lacking. Therefore, this study's goal was to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy with that of standard bismuth-based quadruple therapy as first-line regimens. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 197 treatment-naïve adults with H. pylori infection who received levofloxacin-based triple (levofloxacin + amoxicillin + PPI) therapy (n = 81) or standard bismuth-based quadruple (bismuth + tetracycline + metronidazole + PPI) therapy (n = 116). H. pylori eradication was evaluated 4–8 weeks after medication administration using the 13C-urea breath test, and variables that could affect the rate of success were examined. Results: There were no differences between groups in terms of age, sex, nationality, or type of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) used. The bismuth-based quadruple therapy group exhibited a markedly superior success rate compared to the levofloxacin-based triple therapy group when the latter was administered for 7 or 10 days (81.03% vs. 6.66%, p < 0.001, and 81.03% vs. 36.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). However, when the levofloxacin-based triple therapy was extended to 14 days, its H. pylori eradication rate became comparable to that of the 10-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (81.03% vs. 80%, p = 0.898). Eradication rates for both regimens were similar for patients aged ≥ 60, non-Saudi, when using omeprazole and those treated with levofloxacin-based triple therapy for 14 days. Conclusion: Quadruple treatment based on bismuth is superior to triple therapy based on levofloxacin for eradicating H. pylori in Saudi Arabia and should be used as a first-line treatment. However, the 14-day levofloxacin-based triple treatment had an H. pylori eradication rate comparable to that of the 10-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy.
KW - H. pylori
KW - bismuth
KW - efficacy
KW - eradication
KW - levofloxacin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217038818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hsr2.70432
DO - 10.1002/hsr2.70432
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85217038818
SN - 2398-8835
VL - 8
JO - Health Science Reports
JF - Health Science Reports
IS - 2
M1 - e70432
ER -