TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental study on sewage water for clean water and hydrogen production using heat pump-driven solar still and alkaline electrolyzer
AU - Bacha, Habib Ben
AU - Joseph, Abanob
AU - Abdullah, A. S.
AU - Sharshir, Swellam W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - The current work concentrates on offering distilled water as a substitute water source for the electrolysis process. In place of the laboratory water distiller, the heat pump solar still (HPSS) was introduced during the work to distill sewage water. Additionally, a comparison is made between the treated water-based electrolyte's performance and that of the standard electrolyte based on the energy, exergy, and cost of water. The production of hydrogen, energy, and exergetic efficiency and the influence of each electrolyte on the electrode material are then compared for the two types of water during the electrolysis process. Finally, both electrolytes are examined at different cell voltages. The HPSS unit provided 12.48 L/m2 of distilled water after an operation period from 9:00 to 21:00, with energy efficiency 4.91 % higher than the water distiller and 3.88 % lower exergy loss than the laboratory water distiller. When comparing the two water types, the electrolysis process showed that the hydrogen productivity reduction was only 5.2 % as the production rate was 0.742 gH2/hr and 0.704 gH2/hr for the case of standard distilled water and treated water, respectively. When the voltage increased from 6.66 V to 9.5 V, the hydrogen production rate increased by 21.84 % for the standard electrolyte and 22 % for the treated water-based electrolyte. Conversely, the energy efficiency declined by 29.8 % and 29.7 %, respectively.
AB - The current work concentrates on offering distilled water as a substitute water source for the electrolysis process. In place of the laboratory water distiller, the heat pump solar still (HPSS) was introduced during the work to distill sewage water. Additionally, a comparison is made between the treated water-based electrolyte's performance and that of the standard electrolyte based on the energy, exergy, and cost of water. The production of hydrogen, energy, and exergetic efficiency and the influence of each electrolyte on the electrode material are then compared for the two types of water during the electrolysis process. Finally, both electrolytes are examined at different cell voltages. The HPSS unit provided 12.48 L/m2 of distilled water after an operation period from 9:00 to 21:00, with energy efficiency 4.91 % higher than the water distiller and 3.88 % lower exergy loss than the laboratory water distiller. When comparing the two water types, the electrolysis process showed that the hydrogen productivity reduction was only 5.2 % as the production rate was 0.742 gH2/hr and 0.704 gH2/hr for the case of standard distilled water and treated water, respectively. When the voltage increased from 6.66 V to 9.5 V, the hydrogen production rate increased by 21.84 % for the standard electrolyte and 22 % for the treated water-based electrolyte. Conversely, the energy efficiency declined by 29.8 % and 29.7 %, respectively.
KW - Alkaline electrolyzer
KW - Green hydrogen
KW - Sewage water
KW - Solar still
KW - Water electrolysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005096046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105307
DO - 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105307
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105005096046
SN - 2590-1230
VL - 26
JO - Results in Engineering
JF - Results in Engineering
M1 - 105307
ER -