Evaluating the Internal Anatomy of Maxillary Premolars in an Adult Saudi Subpopulation Using 2 Classifications: A CBCT-Based Retrospective Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Understanding the root canal morphology is important for successful endodontic treatment. This retrospective cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study aimed to compare the adult maxillary premolars (MP), root, and canal morphology among a Saudi Arabian subpopulation based on Vertucci and Ahmed classifications. Material/Methods: Scans of 1336 MP – 656 first premolars (MFP) and 680 second premolars (MSP) – were analyzed for the number of roots, morphology of the canals, and symmetry among them. The data were grouped based on the traditional preestablished Vertucci system and newer instantaneous code-based Ahmed classification. Comparative analysis was done using the chi-square test. Results: Two roots were common in MFP with 84.4% of the population, followed by those with 1 root and those with 3 roots. In MSP, single roots were more common. The results were non-significant with P values of 0.859 and 0.471, respectively. Most of these MFP had Type IV Vertucci configuration/2TNB1P1 Ahmed et al code (TN-tooth number, B-buccal canal, P-palatal canal). In MSP, Type I Vertucci/1TN1 Ahmed et al code was most common. However, the results were not statistically significant for the PM with P values of 0.997 and 0.732, respectively. Sex-based difference among them for the roots and root canals was also non-significant. Symmetry among PM in opposite quadrants was 87.1% in MFP and 90% in MSP. Conclusions: Two roots with Type IV (2TNB1P1) and 1 root with Type I (1TN1) were most common in MFP and MSP, respectively. Symmetry among opposing PM was high.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMedical Science Monitor
Volume30
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
  • Dental Pulp Cavity
  • Endodontics
  • Root Canal Therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the Internal Anatomy of Maxillary Premolars in an Adult Saudi Subpopulation Using 2 Classifications: A CBCT-Based Retrospective Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this