TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhanced Aquila Optimizer for Economic Environmental Dispatch with Cubic Fuel Cost and Emission Models
AU - Aljumah, Ali S.
AU - Alqahtani, Mohammed H.
AU - Shaheen, Abdullah M.
AU - Elsayed, Abdallah M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The economic environmental dispatch (EED) problem often utilizes linear or quadratic models, which fail to capture the nonlinear relationship between fuel costs and emissions. This study hypothesizes that a cubic model will better approximate these complexities. We propose an Improved Aquila Optimizer (IAO), which eliminates dependency on the best solution and incorporates a regeneration mechanism. The proposed (IAO) model gains the ability to perform a more thorough exploration of the search space, allowing for a broader range of potential solutions to be considered. Also, every dimension of the newly created solutions is examined to guarantee that the algorithm's generated solutions stay viable and legitimate inside the constraints of the problem. The IAO is rigorously tested against CEC 2017 benchmarks and validated using the IEEE 30-bus power system, showing significant improvements in minimizing fuel costs and emissions. For a 225 MW load, the IAO achieved a mean fuel cost of 16,784.45/h, outperforming other algorithms. Also, the validation is conducted for a large-scale 160-unit system where the proposed IAO demonstrates significant improvements in minimizing fuel costs, emissions, and achieving the best compromise costs with reductions of 7.68%, 47.42%, and 57.39% respectively compared to the AO algorithm.
AB - The economic environmental dispatch (EED) problem often utilizes linear or quadratic models, which fail to capture the nonlinear relationship between fuel costs and emissions. This study hypothesizes that a cubic model will better approximate these complexities. We propose an Improved Aquila Optimizer (IAO), which eliminates dependency on the best solution and incorporates a regeneration mechanism. The proposed (IAO) model gains the ability to perform a more thorough exploration of the search space, allowing for a broader range of potential solutions to be considered. Also, every dimension of the newly created solutions is examined to guarantee that the algorithm's generated solutions stay viable and legitimate inside the constraints of the problem. The IAO is rigorously tested against CEC 2017 benchmarks and validated using the IEEE 30-bus power system, showing significant improvements in minimizing fuel costs and emissions. For a 225 MW load, the IAO achieved a mean fuel cost of 16,784.45/h, outperforming other algorithms. Also, the validation is conducted for a large-scale 160-unit system where the proposed IAO demonstrates significant improvements in minimizing fuel costs, emissions, and achieving the best compromise costs with reductions of 7.68%, 47.42%, and 57.39% respectively compared to the AO algorithm.
KW - Aquila optimizer
KW - CEC 2017 benchmark models
KW - cubic emission models
KW - cubic fuel cost model
KW - economic environmental dispatch
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204546082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3461805
DO - 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3461805
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85204546082
SN - 2169-3536
VL - 12
SP - 135929
EP - 135960
JO - IEEE Access
JF - IEEE Access
ER -