TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of the Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend and goal setting intervention on decoding and reading comprehension skills of young adults with intellectual disabilities
AU - Hua, Youjia
AU - Yuan, Chengan
AU - Monroe, Kristin
AU - Hinzman, Michelle L.
AU - Alqahtani, Saeed
AU - Alwahbi, Abdullah Abdulmohsen
AU - Kern, Amanda M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2018/7/4
Y1 - 2018/7/4
N2 - Objective: Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) + Goal Setting intervention is a reading intervention that addresses both oral reading fluency (ORF) and reading comprehension while supporting persistence and motivation for learners who struggle with reading. Method: We delivered the RAAC + Goal Setting intervention to five young adult learners with intellectual disabilities (ID) in a postsecondary education setting. In the study, we investigated the effects of the intervention on generalization of reading skills to novel passages. Results: Utilizing a response-guided and randomized multiple-baseline across the participants’ design, we failed to reject the null hypothesis of no treatment effects based on the computed p-value. Traditional visual analysis of the data also reached a similar conclusion, however, we found that two participants’ decoding skills improved during the intervention. Conclusions: We did not find a functional relation between the intervention and student reading performance.
AB - Objective: Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) + Goal Setting intervention is a reading intervention that addresses both oral reading fluency (ORF) and reading comprehension while supporting persistence and motivation for learners who struggle with reading. Method: We delivered the RAAC + Goal Setting intervention to five young adult learners with intellectual disabilities (ID) in a postsecondary education setting. In the study, we investigated the effects of the intervention on generalization of reading skills to novel passages. Results: Utilizing a response-guided and randomized multiple-baseline across the participants’ design, we failed to reject the null hypothesis of no treatment effects based on the computed p-value. Traditional visual analysis of the data also reached a similar conclusion, however, we found that two participants’ decoding skills improved during the intervention. Conclusions: We did not find a functional relation between the intervention and student reading performance.
KW - Masked visual analysis
KW - randomized single case research
KW - reading intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961393723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/17518423.2016.1139011
DO - 10.3109/17518423.2016.1139011
M3 - Article
C2 - 27003676
AN - SCOPUS:84961393723
SN - 1751-8423
VL - 21
SP - 279
EP - 289
JO - Developmental Neurorehabilitation
JF - Developmental Neurorehabilitation
IS - 5
ER -