Developing pediatric three-dimensional upper airway normative values using fixed and interactive thresholds

  • Ahmed I. Masoud
  • , Farhan H. Alwadei
  • , Abdurahman H. Alwadei
  • , Edward Y. Lin
  • , Maria Grace Costa Viana
  • , Budi Kusnoto
  • , Carla A. Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To develop and compare pediatric upper airway three-dimensional normative values using the two most commonly used cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) software: Invivo5 (fixed threshold) and Dolphin 3D (interactive threshold). Study design: Out of 3738 CBCT scans, scans of 81 pediatric patients were utilized after applying strict exclusion criteria. The sample was grouped into two age groups (7–11 and 12–17 years). Intra-class correlation coefficient was used to test intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and showed coefficients greater than 0.9 indicating good reliability of the methods used. Results: Paired t tests showed that volumetric and area measurements obtained using Dolphin 3D were significantly larger than those obtained using Invivo5 (p < 0.05). The mean minimal cross-sectional areas (MCSA) for Dolphin 3D were 151 mm2 and 177 mm2 for age groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean MCSA values for Invivo5 for age groups 1 and 2 were 120 mm2 and 145 mm2, respectively. Conclusion: Pediatric upper airway volumetric, area, and linear measurements were reported after applying strict exclusion criteria including a validated sleep questionnaire. Our goal is that clinicians utilize the proposed-here normative values for screening and assist in the timely diagnosis and management of pediatric sleep apnea.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-99
Number of pages11
JournalOral Radiology
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Adenoids
  • Airway
  • CBCT
  • OSA
  • Sleep apnea

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing pediatric three-dimensional upper airway normative values using fixed and interactive thresholds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this