TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-Utility Analysis of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery for Individuals with Obesity in Saudi Arabia
AU - Nagi, Mouaddh Abdulmalik
AU - Turongkaravee, Saowalak
AU - Almalki, Ziyad Saeed
AU - Thavorncharoensap, Montarat
AU - Sangroongruangsri, Sermsiri
AU - Chaikledkaew, Usa
AU - Alqahtani, Abdulhadi M.
AU - Alsharif, Lamis S.
AU - Alsubaihi, Ibrahim A.
AU - Alzarea, Abdulaziz I.
AU - Alsultan, Mohammed M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Nagi et al.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective and relatively safe intervention for managing obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of MBS compared with the standard treatment—lifestyle modification plus liraglutide—in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: A Markov model was developed to estimate the lifetime costs and outcomes of MBS. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. The analysis was conducted from societal and healthcare system perspectives, using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one to three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. Direct medical and nonmedical costs were obtained from hospital records and patient surveys, respectively. Transitional probabilities and utility values were obtained from published literature and primary data collection in the KSA. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. Results: Over a lifetime horizon, MBS yielded 0.38 incremental QALY and US$ 11,975 (Saudi Riyal [SAR] 44,905; purchasing power parity [PPP] 23,911) incremental costs, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 31,909 (SAR 119,660; PPP 63,717) per QALY gained from a societal perspective and US$ 36,353 (SAR 136,324); PPP 72,590) from a healthcare system perspective. The model was most sensitive to the discount rates of costs and outcomes and the direct medical costs associated with MBS. At a WTP threshold of one GDP per capita (US$ 30,436; SAR 114,135; PPP 60,775), the standard treatment had a 63% probability of being cost-effective. However, at a threshold of approximately 1.8 GDP per capita (US$ 56,000; SAR 210,000; PPP 111,821), MBS was cost-effective in 100% of the iterations. Conclusion: MBS is a cost-effective intervention compared with standard treatment in the context of the KSA. Efforts should be made to expand earlier and equitable access to MBS for individuals with a BMI > 40 kg/m2 without comorbidities across the country.
AB - Background: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective and relatively safe intervention for managing obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of MBS compared with the standard treatment—lifestyle modification plus liraglutide—in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: A Markov model was developed to estimate the lifetime costs and outcomes of MBS. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. The analysis was conducted from societal and healthcare system perspectives, using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one to three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. Direct medical and nonmedical costs were obtained from hospital records and patient surveys, respectively. Transitional probabilities and utility values were obtained from published literature and primary data collection in the KSA. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. Results: Over a lifetime horizon, MBS yielded 0.38 incremental QALY and US$ 11,975 (Saudi Riyal [SAR] 44,905; purchasing power parity [PPP] 23,911) incremental costs, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 31,909 (SAR 119,660; PPP 63,717) per QALY gained from a societal perspective and US$ 36,353 (SAR 136,324); PPP 72,590) from a healthcare system perspective. The model was most sensitive to the discount rates of costs and outcomes and the direct medical costs associated with MBS. At a WTP threshold of one GDP per capita (US$ 30,436; SAR 114,135; PPP 60,775), the standard treatment had a 63% probability of being cost-effective. However, at a threshold of approximately 1.8 GDP per capita (US$ 56,000; SAR 210,000; PPP 111,821), MBS was cost-effective in 100% of the iterations. Conclusion: MBS is a cost-effective intervention compared with standard treatment in the context of the KSA. Efforts should be made to expand earlier and equitable access to MBS for individuals with a BMI > 40 kg/m2 without comorbidities across the country.
KW - cost-utility
KW - economic evaluation
KW - metabolic bariatric surgery
KW - obesity
KW - Saudi Arabia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105012279911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/CEOR.S527169
DO - 10.2147/CEOR.S527169
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105012279911
SN - 1178-6981
VL - 17
SP - 519
EP - 533
JO - ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
JF - ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ER -