TY - JOUR
T1 - Computational analysis of controlled drug release from porous polymeric carrier with the aid of Mass transfer and Artificial Intelligence modeling
AU - Alshahrani, Saad M.
AU - Alotaibi, Hadil Faris
AU - Begum, M. Yasmin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Controlled release of a desired drug from porous polymeric biomaterials was analyzed via computational method. The method is based on simulation of mass transfer and utilization of artificial intelligence (AI). This study explores the efficacy of three regression models, i.e., Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Gradient Boosting (GB) in determining the concentration of a chemical substance (C) based on coordinates (r, z). Leveraging Firefly Optimization (FFA) for hyperparameter optimization, the models are fine-tuned to maximize their predictive performance. The findings unveil notable disparities in the performance metrics of the models, with GB showcasing the most impressive R2 score of 0.9977, indicative of a remarkable alignment with the data. GPR closely trails with an R2 score of 0.88754, while KRR falls short with an R2 score of 0.76134. Additionally, GB manifests the most modest Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) among the trio of models, further cementing its supremacy in predictive precision. These outcomes accentuate the significance of judiciously selecting regression methodologies and optimization approaches for adeptly modeling intricate spatial datasets.
AB - Controlled release of a desired drug from porous polymeric biomaterials was analyzed via computational method. The method is based on simulation of mass transfer and utilization of artificial intelligence (AI). This study explores the efficacy of three regression models, i.e., Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Gradient Boosting (GB) in determining the concentration of a chemical substance (C) based on coordinates (r, z). Leveraging Firefly Optimization (FFA) for hyperparameter optimization, the models are fine-tuned to maximize their predictive performance. The findings unveil notable disparities in the performance metrics of the models, with GB showcasing the most impressive R2 score of 0.9977, indicative of a remarkable alignment with the data. GPR closely trails with an R2 score of 0.88754, while KRR falls short with an R2 score of 0.76134. Additionally, GB manifests the most modest Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) among the trio of models, further cementing its supremacy in predictive precision. These outcomes accentuate the significance of judiciously selecting regression methodologies and optimization approaches for adeptly modeling intricate spatial datasets.
KW - Controlled release
KW - Gaussian process regression (GPR)
KW - Gradient boosting (GB)
KW - Kernel Ridge regression (KRR)
KW - Pharmaceutics
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209581473
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-024-79749-6
DO - 10.1038/s41598-024-79749-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 39558051
AN - SCOPUS:85209581473
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 14
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 28422
ER -