TY - JOUR
T1 - Compression force variability and its impact on radiation dose in Saudi breast cancer screening mammography
T2 - An analysis across centers, operators, and equipment
AU - Albeshan, Salman M.
AU - Alhulail, Ahmad A.
AU - Almuqbil, Maha M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Objectives: This study aims to investigate the variability in applied compression force (CF) within the Saudi breast cancer screening program centers. Methods: A dataset of 187,788 mammograms from nine breast-screening centers collected between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed. Variations in CF by centre, operator, and manufacturer were tested. Correlations with exposure factors and radiation dose with CF were tested. In the sub-analysis, 865 mammograms with BI-RADS density categories were included along with data regarding 12 operators. Results: Significant variability in CF across operators, centers, and machines (p < 0.0001), with an overall mean CF of 135.07 ± 37 N. Most CF measurements (60 %–70 %) adhered to international recommendations. Fuji recorded the highest mean CF of 133.3 N, while Hologic had the lowest at 120.5 N. A weak negative correlation existed between CF and mean glandular dose (MGD) (r = −0.205, p < 0.001), with CF explaining only 1.7 % of the variance in MGD while mAs was responsible for 73.2 % of MGD variability. No significant differences in CF were noted across BI-RADS categories (p = 0.241). Conclusions: While a significant proportion of CF values align with international standards, considerable variability exists, influenced by equipment type and operator. The findings aligned with previous recommendations about the importance of developing more precise, evidence-based CF guidelines.
AB - Objectives: This study aims to investigate the variability in applied compression force (CF) within the Saudi breast cancer screening program centers. Methods: A dataset of 187,788 mammograms from nine breast-screening centers collected between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed. Variations in CF by centre, operator, and manufacturer were tested. Correlations with exposure factors and radiation dose with CF were tested. In the sub-analysis, 865 mammograms with BI-RADS density categories were included along with data regarding 12 operators. Results: Significant variability in CF across operators, centers, and machines (p < 0.0001), with an overall mean CF of 135.07 ± 37 N. Most CF measurements (60 %–70 %) adhered to international recommendations. Fuji recorded the highest mean CF of 133.3 N, while Hologic had the lowest at 120.5 N. A weak negative correlation existed between CF and mean glandular dose (MGD) (r = −0.205, p < 0.001), with CF explaining only 1.7 % of the variance in MGD while mAs was responsible for 73.2 % of MGD variability. No significant differences in CF were noted across BI-RADS categories (p = 0.241). Conclusions: While a significant proportion of CF values align with international standards, considerable variability exists, influenced by equipment type and operator. The findings aligned with previous recommendations about the importance of developing more precise, evidence-based CF guidelines.
KW - Compression force
KW - Mammography
KW - Radiation dose
KW - Saudi breast cancer screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006693208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112962
DO - 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112962
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105006693208
SN - 0969-806X
VL - 237
JO - Radiation Physics and Chemistry
JF - Radiation Physics and Chemistry
M1 - 112962
ER -