TY - JOUR
T1 - BIOCOMPATIBILITY AND IMMUNE RESPONSE OF 3D-PRINTED BIOMATERIALS IN CRANIOFACIAL BONE RECONSTRUCTION
T2 - A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW
AU - Alwadei, Saleh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, ASTRA SCIENCE. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Craniofacial bone deformities, which may happen because of trauma, cancer surgery, or birth anomalies, are very hard to fix in surgery since the skull and face have very complicated anatomical and functional needs. Traditional ways of reconstructing things, such autografts, allografts, and regular prostheses, typically have problems like donor site morbidity, not fitting the anatomy well, and not integrating well with the body. The introduction of 3D printing (also known as additive manufacturing) has changed the area of craniofacial reconstruction by making it possible to make patient-specific implants (PSIs) with exact shapes and material qualities that are particular to each patient. This study looks at the many 3D printing methods and biomaterials used for cranial bone repair in a systematic way, looking at how they affect mechanical integrity, biological integration, and clinical outcomes. It talks about the benefits of this technology, the problems it faces right now, and the steps that need to be taken to move customized craniofacial regenerative medicine forward in the future.
AB - Craniofacial bone deformities, which may happen because of trauma, cancer surgery, or birth anomalies, are very hard to fix in surgery since the skull and face have very complicated anatomical and functional needs. Traditional ways of reconstructing things, such autografts, allografts, and regular prostheses, typically have problems like donor site morbidity, not fitting the anatomy well, and not integrating well with the body. The introduction of 3D printing (also known as additive manufacturing) has changed the area of craniofacial reconstruction by making it possible to make patient-specific implants (PSIs) with exact shapes and material qualities that are particular to each patient. This study looks at the many 3D printing methods and biomaterials used for cranial bone repair in a systematic way, looking at how they affect mechanical integrity, biological integration, and clinical outcomes. It talks about the benefits of this technology, the problems it faces right now, and the steps that need to be taken to move customized craniofacial regenerative medicine forward in the future.
KW - 3D printing
KW - and Surgical planning
KW - Biomaterials
KW - Bone tissue engineering
KW - Craniofacial bone reconstruction
KW - Customized implants
KW - Patient-specific implants
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105010870893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.6-5
DO - 10.58240/1829006X-2025.21.6-5
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105010870893
SN - 1829-006X
VL - 21
SP - 5
EP - 12
JO - Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 6
ER -