TY - JOUR
T1 - Appraisal of rock dynamic, physical, and mechanical properties and forecasting shear wave velocity using machine learning and statistical methods
AU - Alenizi, Farhan A.
AU - Mohammed, Adil Hussein
AU - Alizadeh, S. M.
AU - Mahdizadeh Gohari, Omid
AU - Motahari, Mohammad Reza
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Direct determination of shear wave velocity requires time, cost, and high accuracy due to the complexity of the rock texture. In current research statistical and intelligent approaches have been used to predict the shear wave velocity of rock samples. Also, a new correlation between dynamic and static rock properties was established and the shear wave velocity was estimated based on index tests using Gaussian process regression, multivariate linear regression, feedforward back-propagation artificial neural network, and K-nearest neighbor methods. In total, 120 data related to limestone and sandstone samples of the main projects were used for modeling. Water absorption, compressional wave velocity, and density were used as inputs. The outcomes revealed that the PW/SW ratio is equal to 1.69. Various statistics were used to check the method results. The statistical results showed that it is possible to forecast Ed, and SW with high accuracy. Also, the precision of the GPR was higher than the FBP-ANN, statistical analysis, and KNN. Estimation of SW by GPR showed R of 0.992, and RMSE of 0.06, respectively. These four methods were able to estimate the SW with a mean variation percentage of +0.19%. It's important to consider that these models are best suited for predicting SW when the predictor indicators fall within the same range as this study.
AB - Direct determination of shear wave velocity requires time, cost, and high accuracy due to the complexity of the rock texture. In current research statistical and intelligent approaches have been used to predict the shear wave velocity of rock samples. Also, a new correlation between dynamic and static rock properties was established and the shear wave velocity was estimated based on index tests using Gaussian process regression, multivariate linear regression, feedforward back-propagation artificial neural network, and K-nearest neighbor methods. In total, 120 data related to limestone and sandstone samples of the main projects were used for modeling. Water absorption, compressional wave velocity, and density were used as inputs. The outcomes revealed that the PW/SW ratio is equal to 1.69. Various statistics were used to check the method results. The statistical results showed that it is possible to forecast Ed, and SW with high accuracy. Also, the precision of the GPR was higher than the FBP-ANN, statistical analysis, and KNN. Estimation of SW by GPR showed R of 0.992, and RMSE of 0.06, respectively. These four methods were able to estimate the SW with a mean variation percentage of +0.19%. It's important to consider that these models are best suited for predicting SW when the predictor indicators fall within the same range as this study.
KW - Dynamic properties
KW - FBP-ANN
KW - GPR
KW - KNN
KW - Physical and mechanical properties
KW - Statistical analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187797217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105216
DO - 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105216
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85187797217
SN - 0926-9851
VL - 223
JO - Journal of Applied Geophysics
JF - Journal of Applied Geophysics
M1 - 105216
ER -