Adaptation of 3D-Printed and Milled Titanium Custom Post and Core

Background/Objectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the internal adaptation and cement film thickness of cast-gold custom post and core (CPC), three-dimensionally (3D)-printed titanium (Ti) CPC, and milled Ti CPC. Methods: Forty-eight 3D printed resin models, simulating a tooth prepared to receive a CPC, were fabricated. Models were randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 16 per group): (A) cast-gold CPC (control group), (B) 3D-printed Ti CPC, and (C) milled Ti CPC. Following the manufacturing of CPCs, each CPC was cemented using dual-cure polymerizing resin cement. Then, each model/post-and-core assembly was sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the post at a specific point. Each section was photographed using a microscope in a standardized setting (25×). The pixel count for cement surface area was calculated for each image using Adobe Photoshop software. Descriptive statistics of the mean and standard deviation of the cement film thickness around posts were calculated. Kruskal–Wallis and Dwass–Steel–Critchlow–Fligner tests were used for statistical analysis, with a significance level of α = 0.05. Results: Pairwise comparisons in the coronal section revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups A and B and groups B and C. In the middle section, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups A and B only. In the apical section, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between all groups. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, neither 3D printed nor milled Ti CPC could achieve comparable cement film thickness to cast-gold CPC in all three sections. Cast-gold CPC cement film thickness was found to be more reduced and consistent, thus having superior internal adaptation to 3D-printed and milled Ti CPCs.