Writing instruction and the development of ESL writing skills: A case study in Indian context

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Writing instruction in English as a Second Language (ESL) is a challenge for teachers. Writing lessons have to be properly planned by agreeing on the best method as the teaching approaches significantly affect the learning of the students. The research discusses the favorite teaching methods of 10 pre-service teachers in the teaching writing framework (between product and process approach) and the impacts on written texts of students. The data were obtained from reviews, interviews, and written texts. The data was semi-structured. The data from the observation lists were analyzed using the Rasch Measurement Model, which justified the analysis at an alpha Cronbach high-value (0.81). Thematic and textual studies were conducted on the opinions of the participants and the written text of the students. The results have shown that the approach to commodities is the preferred practice. The students, therefore, prepared a very similar pattern of written work based on input from the participants. Students could practice written work with linguistic accuracy, but they did not try to compose more creatively. This study, therefore, recommends that teachers incorporate process approach techniques into their written instructions to direct students to write more indepth in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-247
Number of pages14
JournalAsian ESP Journal
Volume16
Issue number51
StatePublished - Oct 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • English as a Second Language (ESL)
  • Process approach
  • Product approach
  • Writing instruction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Writing instruction and the development of ESL writing skills: A case study in Indian context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this