Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks

  • M. Alkhorayef
  • , A. Sulieman
  • , H. Barakat
  • , H. I. Al-Mohammed
  • , K. Theodorou
  • , C. Kappas
  • , D. Bradley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Medical exposure of the general population due to radiological investigations is the foremost source of all artificial ionising radiation. Here, we focus on a particular diagnostic radiological procedure, as only limited data are published with regard to radiation measurements during urethrograpic imaging. Specifically, this work seeks to estimate patient and occupational effective doses during urethrographic procedures at three radiology hospitals. Both staff and patient X-ray exposure levels were calculated in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK), obtained by means of lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100(LiF:Mg:Cu.P)) for 243 urethrographic examinations. Patient radiation effective doses per procedure were estimated using conversion factors obtained from the use of Public Health England computer software. In units of mGy, the median and range of ESAK per examination were found to be 10.8 (3.6–26.2), 7.0 (0.2–32.3), and 24.3 (9.0–32.0) in Hospitals A, B, and C, respectively. The overall mean and range of staff doses (in µGy) were found to be 310 (4.0–1750) per procedure. With the exception of hospital C, the present evaluations of radiation dose have been found to be similar to those of previously published research. The wide range of patient and staff doses illustrate the need for radiation dose optimisation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-39
Number of pages5
JournalSaudi Journal of Biological Sciences
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Effective dose
  • ESAK
  • Occupational risk
  • Patient dose
  • Radiation risk
  • Urethrography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this