TY - JOUR
T1 - The methods of selecting academic leaders (Faculty members) at new Saudi universities and its relationship to some variables
AU - Aldosari, Share Aiyed M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Sciedu Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The study aims to identify the current method used for selecting academic leaders (faculty members) at new Saudi universities from the viewpoint of faculty members working there, and whether there is a correlation between the method used and the following variables: Job satisfaction, organizational justice, organizational commitment, productivity motivation, and institutional loyalty and affiliation. In order to achieve this, the present researcher designed a questionnaire consisting of (32) items divided according to the variables mentioned. This questionnaire was distributed to the study sample, i.e. 300 faculty members who were randomly chosen from the study community (2382 members). The results show that there is a correlation between the method used and the foregoing variables (i.e. job satisfaction, organizational justice, organizational commitment, productivity motivation, and institutional loyalty and affiliation) which was at an intermediate level, with the exception of the productivity motivation which was at a high level for university professors, despite the fact that these variables are lower than expected. This made the present researcher recommend that the university and the Ministry of Education would review that mechanism and hold conferences and workshops in order to address it before it causes these positive professors to suffer from disappointment and job burnout. The study also revealed that there were statistically significant differences related to experience, academic rank, and officiality and contracting.
AB - The study aims to identify the current method used for selecting academic leaders (faculty members) at new Saudi universities from the viewpoint of faculty members working there, and whether there is a correlation between the method used and the following variables: Job satisfaction, organizational justice, organizational commitment, productivity motivation, and institutional loyalty and affiliation. In order to achieve this, the present researcher designed a questionnaire consisting of (32) items divided according to the variables mentioned. This questionnaire was distributed to the study sample, i.e. 300 faculty members who were randomly chosen from the study community (2382 members). The results show that there is a correlation between the method used and the foregoing variables (i.e. job satisfaction, organizational justice, organizational commitment, productivity motivation, and institutional loyalty and affiliation) which was at an intermediate level, with the exception of the productivity motivation which was at a high level for university professors, despite the fact that these variables are lower than expected. This made the present researcher recommend that the university and the Ministry of Education would review that mechanism and hold conferences and workshops in order to address it before it causes these positive professors to suffer from disappointment and job burnout. The study also revealed that there were statistically significant differences related to experience, academic rank, and officiality and contracting.
KW - Academic leaders (faculty members)
KW - Appointing academic leaders (faculty members)
KW - New Saudi universities
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85085685518
U2 - 10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p69
DO - 10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p69
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085685518
SN - 1927-6044
VL - 9
SP - 69
EP - 83
JO - International Journal of Higher Education
JF - International Journal of Higher Education
IS - 4
ER -