TY - JOUR
T1 - The Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions when Using and Varying the Material and Diameter of the Dental Implant Scan Bodies
AU - Althubaitiy, Ramzi
AU - Sambrook, Raelene
AU - Weisbloom, Michael
AU - Petridis, Haralampos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by Dennis Barber Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The effects of using and varying the material and diameter of implant scan bodies (ISBs) on the level of accuracy of digital implant impressions is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate these effects on the level of accuracy of scans made by an extraoral scanner (EOS) and intraoral scanner (IOS). A stone cast with two sets of ISBs was used. ISBs were made of titanium (TI) or polyether ether ketone (PEEK). Each set consisted of two narrow diameter (ND) and two regular diameter (RD) ISBs. Sixty-six scans were performed and imported into an inspection and metrology software to conduct the three-dimensional (3D) comparisons (N=140) and obtain root mean square (RMS) values. RMS values were analyzed with descriptive and inferential non-paramet-ric statistics (α=.05). The use of ISBs did not improve the overall EOS and IOS scans accuracies. Also, varying the ISBs’ diameter and material influenced the EOS and IOS accuracies. For the EOS, the precision in descending order was as follows RD TI, ND TI, RD PEEK, ND PEEK. In contrast, for the IOS an inverse relationship was noted. Finally, precision assessment should always be performed for any reference scanner under the proposed test conditions.
AB - The effects of using and varying the material and diameter of implant scan bodies (ISBs) on the level of accuracy of digital implant impressions is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate these effects on the level of accuracy of scans made by an extraoral scanner (EOS) and intraoral scanner (IOS). A stone cast with two sets of ISBs was used. ISBs were made of titanium (TI) or polyether ether ketone (PEEK). Each set consisted of two narrow diameter (ND) and two regular diameter (RD) ISBs. Sixty-six scans were performed and imported into an inspection and metrology software to conduct the three-dimensional (3D) comparisons (N=140) and obtain root mean square (RMS) values. RMS values were analyzed with descriptive and inferential non-paramet-ric statistics (α=.05). The use of ISBs did not improve the overall EOS and IOS scans accuracies. Also, varying the ISBs’ diameter and material influenced the EOS and IOS accuracies. For the EOS, the precision in descending order was as follows RD TI, ND TI, RD PEEK, ND PEEK. In contrast, for the IOS an inverse relationship was noted. Finally, precision assessment should always be performed for any reference scanner under the proposed test conditions.
KW - Narrow Diameter
KW - Optical Scanner
KW - Polyether Ether Ketone
KW - Precision
KW - Regular Diameter
KW - Titanium
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143180994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1922/EJPRD_2367Althubaitiy09
DO - 10.1922/EJPRD_2367Althubaitiy09
M3 - Article
C2 - 35438267
AN - SCOPUS:85143180994
SN - 0965-7452
VL - 30
SP - 305
EP - 313
JO - European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
JF - European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
IS - 4
ER -