TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeated Reading and Error Correction to Improve Fluency Skills for Students with Learning Disabilities
AU - Alqahtani, Saeed Saad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020. Common Ground Research Networks, Saeed Saad Alqahtani. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Students with learning disabilities (LD) face difficulties in most reading skills, including fluency. Slow readers face even more difficulties in reading comprehension, and these difficulties negatively affect all other skills and performance subjects. Repeated reading is an evidence-based practice intervention for students with LD; however, this study aimed to replicate this intervention among a different population—Arabic-speaking students. In addition, this study aimed to investigate the effect of repeated reading intervention in terms of the generalizability of repeated reading effects. Single-subject, multiple-baseline design was used to examine the effect of repeated reading and error correction on fluency skills for three elementary-age students with LD. Using the first reading as the main measure, only one student showed improvement during and after intervention. However, using final reading as a measure, two students showed reading fluency improvement. There was an average of 60 percent between first and final readings scores. Generalizing the effect of repeated reading is discussed.
AB - Students with learning disabilities (LD) face difficulties in most reading skills, including fluency. Slow readers face even more difficulties in reading comprehension, and these difficulties negatively affect all other skills and performance subjects. Repeated reading is an evidence-based practice intervention for students with LD; however, this study aimed to replicate this intervention among a different population—Arabic-speaking students. In addition, this study aimed to investigate the effect of repeated reading intervention in terms of the generalizability of repeated reading effects. Single-subject, multiple-baseline design was used to examine the effect of repeated reading and error correction on fluency skills for three elementary-age students with LD. Using the first reading as the main measure, only one student showed improvement during and after intervention. However, using final reading as a measure, two students showed reading fluency improvement. There was an average of 60 percent between first and final readings scores. Generalizing the effect of repeated reading is discussed.
KW - Intervention
KW - Learning Disability
KW - Reading Fluency
KW - Repeated Reading
KW - Single-Subject Design
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099335691
U2 - 10.18848/2327-0136/CGP/V28I01/19-30
DO - 10.18848/2327-0136/CGP/V28I01/19-30
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099335691
SN - 2327-0136
VL - 28
SP - 19
EP - 30
JO - International Journal of Literacies
JF - International Journal of Literacies
IS - 1
ER -