Modified Harris Hawks Optimization Based Test Case Prioritization for Software Testing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Generally, software testing is considered as a proficient technique to achieve improvement in quality and reliability of the software. But, the quality of test cases has a considerable influence on fault revealing capability of software testing activity. Test Case Prioritization (TCP) remains a challenging issue since prioritizing test cases is unsatisfactory in terms of Average Percentage of Faults Detected (APFD) and time spent upon execution results. TCP ismainly intended to design a collection of test cases that can accomplish early optimization using preferred characteristics. The studies conducted earlier focused on prioritizing the available test cases in accelerating fault detection rate during software testing. In this aspect, the current study designs aModified Harris Hawks Optimization based TCP (MHHO-TCP) technique for software testing. The aim of the proposed MHHO-TCP technique is to maximize APFD and minimize the overall execution time. In addition, MHHO algorithm is designed to boost the exploration and exploitation abilities of conventional HHO algorithm. In order to validate the enhanced efficiency of MHHO-TCP technique, a wide range of simulations was conducted on different benchmark programs and the results were examined under several aspects. The experimental outcomes highlight the improved efficiency of MHHO-TCP technique over recent approaches under different measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1951-1965
Number of pages15
JournalComputers, Materials and Continua
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Apfd
  • Execution time
  • Harris hawks optimization
  • Metaheuristics
  • Software testing
  • Test case prioritization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modified Harris Hawks Optimization Based Test Case Prioritization for Software Testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this