MoCap-Impute: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Comparative Analysis of Imputation Methods for IMU-Based Motion Capture Data

Motion capture (MoCap) data derived from wearable Inertial Measurement Units is essential to applications in sports science and healthcare robotics. However, a significant amount of the potential of this data is limited due to missing data derived from sensor limitations, network issues, and environmental interference. Such limitations can introduce bias, prevent the fusion of critical data streams, and ultimately compromise the integrity of human activity analysis. Despite the plethora of data imputation techniques available, there have been few systematic performance evaluations of these techniques explicitly for the time series data of IMU-derived MoCap data. We address this by evaluating the imputation performance across three distinct contexts: univariate time series, multivariate across players, and multivariate across kinematic angles. To address this limitation, we propose a systematic comparative analysis of imputation techniques, including statistical, machine learning, and deep learning techniques, in this paper. We also introduce the first publicly available MoCap dataset specifically for the purpose of benchmarking missing value imputation, with three missingness mechanisms: missing completely at random, block missingness, and a simulated value-dependent missingness pattern simulated at the signal transition points. Using data from 53 karate practitioners performing standardized movements, we artificially generated missing values to create controlled experimental conditions. We performed experiments across the 53 subjects with 39 kinematic variables, which showed that discriminating between univariate and multivariate imputation frameworks demonstrates that multivariate imputation frameworks surpassunivariate approaches when working with more complex missingness mechanisms. Specifically, multivariate approaches achieved up to a 50% error reduction (with the MAE improving from 10.8 ± 6.9 to 5.8 ± 5.5) compared to univariate methods for transition point missingness. Specialized time series deep learning models (i.e., SAITS, BRITS, GRU-D) demonstrated a superior performance with MAE values consistently below 8.0 for univariate contexts and below 3.2 for multivariate contexts across all missing data percentages, significantly surpassing traditional machine learning and statistical methods. Notable traditional methods such as Generative Adversarial Imputation Networks and Iterative Imputers exhibited a competitive performance but remained less stable than the specialized temporal models. This work offers an important baseline for future studies, in addition to recommendations for researchers looking to increase the accuracy and robustness of MoCap data analysis, as well as integrity and trustworthiness.