TY - JOUR
T1 - Ipad Text-to-Speech and Repeated Reading to Improve Reading Comprehension for Students with SLD
AU - Alqahtani, Saeed S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Students with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have difficulty with most reading skills, including reading comprehension. Improving reading comprehension skills requires efficient interventions that consider both meaning- and code-based skills simultaneously. Using a single-subject multiple-baseline design across participants, with alternating treatment design, this study compared two reading interventions (repeated reading vs. iPad text-to-speech) combined with a meta-cognitive strategy (question generation). Three fourth-grade and third-grade students who had been diagnosed by their school as having reading difficulties participated in the study. Using the index of narrative complexity, two participants showed improvement in reading comprehension skills. However, there were slight differences for the RAAC intervention over the iPad intervention for one participant. The time required to administer the iPad intervention was shorter than the time required to administer the Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) intervention (an average of 12.73 min for the repeated reading vs. 5.45 min for the iPad).
AB - Students with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have difficulty with most reading skills, including reading comprehension. Improving reading comprehension skills requires efficient interventions that consider both meaning- and code-based skills simultaneously. Using a single-subject multiple-baseline design across participants, with alternating treatment design, this study compared two reading interventions (repeated reading vs. iPad text-to-speech) combined with a meta-cognitive strategy (question generation). Three fourth-grade and third-grade students who had been diagnosed by their school as having reading difficulties participated in the study. Using the index of narrative complexity, two participants showed improvement in reading comprehension skills. However, there were slight differences for the RAAC intervention over the iPad intervention for one participant. The time required to administer the iPad intervention was shorter than the time required to administer the Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) intervention (an average of 12.73 min for the repeated reading vs. 5.45 min for the iPad).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117274103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10573569.2021.1987363
DO - 10.1080/10573569.2021.1987363
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117274103
SN - 1057-3569
VL - 39
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Reading and Writing Quarterly
JF - Reading and Writing Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -