Fuzzy vs. Traditional Reliability Model for Inverse Weibull Distribution

Eslam Hussam, Mohamed A. Sabry, M. M. Abd El-Raouf, Ehab M. Almetwally

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, fuzzy stress strengths (Formula presented.) and traditional stress strengths (Formula presented.) are considered and compared when X and Y are independently inverse Weibull random variables. When axiomatic fuzzy set theory is taken into account in the stress–strength inference, it enables the generation of more precise studies on the underlying systems. We discuss estimating both conventional and fuzzy models of stress strength utilizing a maximum product of spacing, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Simulations based on the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method are used to produce various estimators of conventional and fuzzy dependability of stress strength for the inverse Weibull model. To generate both conventional and fuzzy models of dependability, we use the Metropolis–Hastings method while performing Bayesian estimation. In conclusion, we will examine a scenario taken from actual life and apply a real-world data application to validate the accuracy of the provided estimators.

Original languageEnglish
Article number582
JournalAxioms
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bayesian
  • fuzzy set
  • inverse Wibull distribution
  • maximum likelihood
  • maximum product of spacing
  • Metropolis–Hastings algorithm
  • stress–strength reliability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fuzzy vs. Traditional Reliability Model for Inverse Weibull Distribution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this