Abstract
Objectives: To assess the efficacy of triphala mouthwash (TRP-MW) in being equally effective to chlorhexidine mouthwash (CHX-MW) in the treatment of plaque-induced gingivitis. Materials and methods: Electronic searches in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL were conducted in databases up to April 2020. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing clinical efficacy of TRP-MW (test group) in comparison with CHX-MW in treating plaque-induced gingivitis were considered. The primary outcome was gingival index (GI), whereas the secondary outcome was plaque index (PI). Results: Seven RCTs were included. All studies showed that TRP-MW administration was significantly effective as compared to CHX-MW in the treatment of plaque-induced gingivitis. Considering the effects of TRP-MW on clinical gingival inflammatory parameters, significant heterogeneity for both GI (χ2 = 72.77, P <.0001, I2 = 91.76%) and PI (χ2 = 153.67, P <.0001, I2 = 96.10%) was observed between both TRP-MW and CHX-MW groups. The overall mean difference for both GI (WMD = −0.29, 95% CI = −0.40 to −0.17, P <.001) and PI (WMD = −0.43, 95% CI = −0.54 to −0.31, P <.001) was statistically significant between TRP-MW and CHX-MW at follow-up, respectively. Conclusion: Triphala mouthwash seems to significantly improve the clinical gingival inflammatory parameters in plaque-induced gingivitis with equal clinical efficacy as CHX-MW. TRP is a cost-effective alternative and is easily available with limited side effects on periodontal tissues.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 344-351 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | International Journal of Dental Hygiene |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Nov 2020 |
Keywords
- chlorhexidine
- gingivitis
- plaque
- systematic review
- triphala