TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of improved deep learning models for multi-step ahead forecasting of daily river water temperature
AU - Gheisari, Mehdi
AU - Shafi, Jana
AU - Kosari, Saeed
AU - Amanabadi, Samaneh
AU - Mehdizadeh, Saeid
AU - Fernandez Campusano, Christian
AU - Barzan Abdalla, Hemn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Precise river water temperature (WT) forecasts are essential for monitoring water quality. This study addresses the limited use of signal decomposition in hybrid WT prediction models by proposing three methods: namely ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) on AdaBoost, long short-term memory (LSTM), and gated recurrent unit (GRU). These models integrate ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) with machine learning techniques for forecasting WT across multiple time horizons (one, three, and five days). The performance of implemented models were tested on two river stations located on the Clackamas River (USGS 14211010) and Willamette River (USGS 14211720). Some error measures comprising root mean square (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R2), uncertainty coefficient in 95% confidence level (U95%), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were applied in assessing the models’ performances. The performance of the proposed merged methods, including EEMD-AdaBoost, EEMD-LSTM, and EEMD-GRU, were compared with their simple forms. The outcomes illustrated that the hybrid models performed better than the relevant individual methods; however, the river WT forecasts of EEMD-LSTM and EEMD-GRU were found to be much closer to the observed data than those of the EEMD-AdaBoost method. The better accuracy of hybrid models compared to their corresponding simple ones can be explained by considering the potential of EEMD in separating intrinsic patterns and reducing the noises, leading to reliable forecasts of river WT time series. A performance comparison of the simple models also denoted the superiority of LSTM and GRU over the AdaBoost. The superior river WT forecasts at both stations during the testing stage were concluded for one day ahead at EEMD-GRU model (USGS 14211010: RMSE = 0.1929 ℃, MAE = 0.1489 ℃, R2 = 0.9988, U95% = 0.3745, MAPE = 1.3608%; USGS 14211720: RMSE = 0.1918 ℃, MAE = 0.1558 ℃, R2 = 0.9990, U95% = 0.3690, MAPE = 1.1790%).
AB - Precise river water temperature (WT) forecasts are essential for monitoring water quality. This study addresses the limited use of signal decomposition in hybrid WT prediction models by proposing three methods: namely ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) on AdaBoost, long short-term memory (LSTM), and gated recurrent unit (GRU). These models integrate ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) with machine learning techniques for forecasting WT across multiple time horizons (one, three, and five days). The performance of implemented models were tested on two river stations located on the Clackamas River (USGS 14211010) and Willamette River (USGS 14211720). Some error measures comprising root mean square (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R2), uncertainty coefficient in 95% confidence level (U95%), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were applied in assessing the models’ performances. The performance of the proposed merged methods, including EEMD-AdaBoost, EEMD-LSTM, and EEMD-GRU, were compared with their simple forms. The outcomes illustrated that the hybrid models performed better than the relevant individual methods; however, the river WT forecasts of EEMD-LSTM and EEMD-GRU were found to be much closer to the observed data than those of the EEMD-AdaBoost method. The better accuracy of hybrid models compared to their corresponding simple ones can be explained by considering the potential of EEMD in separating intrinsic patterns and reducing the noises, leading to reliable forecasts of river WT time series. A performance comparison of the simple models also denoted the superiority of LSTM and GRU over the AdaBoost. The superior river WT forecasts at both stations during the testing stage were concluded for one day ahead at EEMD-GRU model (USGS 14211010: RMSE = 0.1929 ℃, MAE = 0.1489 ℃, R2 = 0.9988, U95% = 0.3745, MAPE = 1.3608%; USGS 14211720: RMSE = 0.1918 ℃, MAE = 0.1558 ℃, R2 = 0.9990, U95% = 0.3690, MAPE = 1.1790%).
KW - deep learning
KW - ensemble empirical mode decomposition
KW - forecasting
KW - hybrid models
KW - River water temperature
KW - time horizon
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215524635
U2 - 10.1080/19942060.2025.2450477
DO - 10.1080/19942060.2025.2450477
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215524635
SN - 1994-2060
VL - 19
JO - Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
JF - Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
IS - 1
M1 - 2450477
ER -