Corrigendum to “Fuel cell as an effective energy storage in reverse osmosis desalination plant powered by photovoltaic system” [Energy 175 (2019) 423–433, (S0360544219303731), (10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.167)]

The authors regret that citation order and typo mistake in the following points: - In Table 3: The current citation for the Power conditioning unit is [41, 55], Fuel Cell is [56], and Electrolyzer is [56]. The correct citation for the Power conditioning [29], Fuel Cell is [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.174], and Electrolyzer is [24, 33, 57]. Life time of electrolyzer and hydrogen storage tank is $10/year. The correct is 10 years - In the caption of Table 4: The current citation is [57]. The correct citations is: [http://www.solarpanelsonline.org/, Accessed August 2018]. - In Table 6 (Electrolyzer): The current replacement cost is $3303 and the O&M is $330. The correct replacement cost is $3073 and the O&M is $3303. - For equation (2): The current citation is [54]. The correct citation is [32]. - For equation (4): The current citation is [63]. The correct citation is [43]. - In section 6.2: The current sentence: The latest grid energy cost issued by Egyptian electricity ministry [64]. The correct citation is: [http://www.moee.gov.eg/english_new/home.aspx, accessed August 2018]. - A typographical error is in the first paragraph of section 5: The current sentence is: Hydrogen tank (25kg) shows the best economic viable option based on the NPC and COE values of $71,806 and $0.047; respectively. The correct sentence is: Hydrogen tank (70kg) shows the best economic viable option based on the NPC and COE values of $115,649 and $0.062/kWh; respectively.