Abstract
Figure Correction In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 9 “Histological evaluation of skin at days 7, 14 and 28 post-excision”. And there was a mistake in Figure 9A, in NC-GL group the same image appears for days 21 and 28. The correct Figure 9 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1156 |
| Journal | Pharmaceutics |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Apr 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |