Abstract
Figure Correction In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 9 “Histological evaluation of skin at days 7, 14 and 28 post-excision”. And there was a mistake in Figure 9A, in NC-GL group the same image appears for days 21 and 28. The correct Figure 9 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1156 |
Journal | Pharmaceutics |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Apr 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |