Assessing the impact of accreditation standardson quality assurance and risk management in higher education institutions: Faculty members’ perceptions

Mahfod Aldoseri, Talha A. Sharadgah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The study examined the perceptions of faculty members at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University on the impact of accreditation standards on quality assurance (QA) and risk management within Saudi Arabia higher education institutions. 305 participants responded to an e-survey. Interviews were conducted with QA consultants. Findings revealed that faculty members perceive accreditation standards to have a positive impact on QA procedures of: (1) program management regarding handbooks, strategic planning, committees, KPIs, feedback mechanisms, (2) missions and goals relating to stakeholders’ awareness and mission consistency, (3) teaching and learning concerning course portfolios, periodic reviews, quality of teaching, outcomes, and coursework plans, (4) faculty involvement in QA and research output, (5) risk management concerning resources and educational risks, (6) learning resources, facilities, and adequacy of equipment, and (7) students, with more emphasis on learning, admission policies, and involvement in assessment. Significant differences were found for gender, age, teaching experience, and academic rank.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues
Volume24
Issue numberSpecial Issue 1
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Accreditation Standards
  • Higher Education Institutions
  • Quality Assurance
  • Risk Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the impact of accreditation standardson quality assurance and risk management in higher education institutions: Faculty members’ perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this