Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the mechanical behavior of reciprocating endodontic files, comparing nickeltitanium (NiTi) and stainless steel 316L (St.St. 316L) as manufacturing material for such instruments. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element model was designed for this study. The simplified instrument model geometry was created on commercial CAD/CAM software. Real strain stress curves of St.St. 316L and NiTi were used in the analysis. Non-linear static analysis was performed to simulate the instrument inside root canal at an angle of 45° in the apical portion, and subjected to torsion of 0.3 N.cm. Results: Non-linear NiTi material showed super elasticity and high functionality in such applications. Very high levels of stress appeared in the file at 3 mm from the tip close to yield point. Conclusions: St. St. 316L is not suitable for manufacturing reciprocating instruments. Modeling of the instrument with equivalent circular cross-sectional area did not affect results quality. Reciprocating instruments have short lifespan, thus manufacturers recommend using one file per tooth. Reciprocating instruments are recommended for less experienced dentist.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 52-59 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Endodontics
- Nickel
- Stainless steel
- Titanium
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A finite element study on the mechanical behavior of reciprocating endodontic files'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver